Рекомендации ESC/EACTS по реваскуляризации миокарда 2018

Рекомендации ESC/EACTS по реваскуляризации миокарда 2018

2019 | Авторы/члены Рабочей группы: Franz-Josef Neumann*, Miguel Sousa-Uva*, Anders Ahlsson*, Fernando Alfonso, Adrian P. Banning, Umberto Benedetto, Robert A. Byrne, Jean-Philippe Collet, Volkmar Falk, Stuart J. Head, Peter Juni, Adnan Kastrati, Akin Koller, Steen D. Kristensen, Josef Niebauer, Dimitrios J. Richter, Petar M. Seferović, Dirk Sibbing, Giulio G. Stefanini, Stephan Windecker, Rashmi Yadav, Michael O. Zembala*
The 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines on myocardial revascularization provide comprehensive and updated evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with myocardial ischemia. The guidelines cover various aspects, including diagnostic methods, decision-making, and patient information. Key points include: 1. **Diagnosis and Prognosis**: - Non-invasive methods (e.g., stress imaging, PET) can assess myocardial ischemia and viability in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease. - Invasive methods, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), are crucial for determining the functional significance of coronary stenoses, especially in cases of marginal stenoses and multi-vessel disease. 2. **Decision-Making**: - FFR is the gold standard for assessing the functional significance of coronary stenoses, with a threshold of ≤0.8 indicating hemodynamic significance. - In patients with marginal stenoses, FFR can guide the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical revascularization. - FFR is particularly useful in patients with severe aortic stenosis and marginal stenoses of the left main coronary artery (LMA). 3. **Patient Information and Informed Consent**: - Patients should be fully informed about the benefits, risks, and alternatives of different treatment options. - Active participation of patients in decision-making is essential, and written informed consent is required for all procedures. 4. **Revascularization Strategies**: - PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are primary treatment options for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). - The choice between PCI and CABG depends on factors such as predicted surgical mortality, anatomical severity, and the extent of myocardial revascularization needed. - For patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation (STEMI), PCI is generally preferred over medical therapy, but the choice depends on the specific clinical scenario. 5. **Special Considerations**: - In patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or valvular heart disease, additional considerations are necessary for revascularization strategies. - Technical aspects of PCI and CABG, including device selection and complications, are discussed in detail. 6. **Efficacy and Safety**: - The guidelines emphasize the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of different treatments. - Meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are used to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various revascularization strategies. 7. **Future Research Directions**: - Further RCTs are needed to compare different revascularization strategies, including the use of CT fractional flow reserve and coronary perfusion imaging. - Studies are also required to refine the role of FFR and other functional measures in guidingThe 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines on myocardial revascularization provide comprehensive and updated evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with myocardial ischemia. The guidelines cover various aspects, including diagnostic methods, decision-making, and patient information. Key points include: 1. **Diagnosis and Prognosis**: - Non-invasive methods (e.g., stress imaging, PET) can assess myocardial ischemia and viability in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease. - Invasive methods, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), are crucial for determining the functional significance of coronary stenoses, especially in cases of marginal stenoses and multi-vessel disease. 2. **Decision-Making**: - FFR is the gold standard for assessing the functional significance of coronary stenoses, with a threshold of ≤0.8 indicating hemodynamic significance. - In patients with marginal stenoses, FFR can guide the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical revascularization. - FFR is particularly useful in patients with severe aortic stenosis and marginal stenoses of the left main coronary artery (LMA). 3. **Patient Information and Informed Consent**: - Patients should be fully informed about the benefits, risks, and alternatives of different treatment options. - Active participation of patients in decision-making is essential, and written informed consent is required for all procedures. 4. **Revascularization Strategies**: - PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are primary treatment options for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). - The choice between PCI and CABG depends on factors such as predicted surgical mortality, anatomical severity, and the extent of myocardial revascularization needed. - For patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation (STEMI), PCI is generally preferred over medical therapy, but the choice depends on the specific clinical scenario. 5. **Special Considerations**: - In patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or valvular heart disease, additional considerations are necessary for revascularization strategies. - Technical aspects of PCI and CABG, including device selection and complications, are discussed in detail. 6. **Efficacy and Safety**: - The guidelines emphasize the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of different treatments. - Meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are used to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various revascularization strategies. 7. **Future Research Directions**: - Further RCTs are needed to compare different revascularization strategies, including the use of CT fractional flow reserve and coronary perfusion imaging. - Studies are also required to refine the role of FFR and other functional measures in guiding
Reach us at info@study.space