FEBRUARY 9, 1995 | ANDRÉS ESTEBAN, M.D., PH.D., FERNANDO FRUTOS, M.D., MARTIN J. TOBIN, M.D., INMACULADA ALÍA, M.D., JOSE F. SOLSONA, M.D., INMACULADA VALVERDÚ, M.D., RAFAEL FERNÁNDEZ, M.D., MIGUEL A. DE LA CAL, M.D., SALVADOR BENITO, M.D., ROSER TOMÁS, M.D., DEMETRIO CARRIEDO, M.D., SANTIAGO MACÍAS, M.D., AND JESÚS BLANCO, M.D., FOR THE SPANISH LUNG FAILURE COLLABORATIVE GROUP
This study compared four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation: intermittent mandatory ventilation, pressure-support ventilation, intermittent trials of spontaneous breathing, and a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing. The study involved 546 patients who had received mechanical ventilation for an average of 7.5 ± 6.1 days. Patients who had respiratory distress during a two-hour trial of spontaneous breathing were randomly assigned to one of the four weaning techniques. The median duration of weaning was 5 days for intermittent mandatory ventilation, 4 days for pressure-support ventilation, 3 days for intermittent trials of spontaneous breathing, and 3 days for a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing. After adjusting for covariates, the rate of successful weaning was significantly higher with a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing compared to intermittent mandatory ventilation (rate ratio, 2.83; P<0.006) and pressure-support ventilation (rate ratio, 2.05; P<0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of success between once-daily trials and multiple daily trials of spontaneous breathing. The study concluded that a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing led to extubation about three times faster than intermittent mandatory ventilation and twice as fast as pressure-support ventilation. Multiple daily trials of spontaneous breathing were equally successful.This study compared four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation: intermittent mandatory ventilation, pressure-support ventilation, intermittent trials of spontaneous breathing, and a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing. The study involved 546 patients who had received mechanical ventilation for an average of 7.5 ± 6.1 days. Patients who had respiratory distress during a two-hour trial of spontaneous breathing were randomly assigned to one of the four weaning techniques. The median duration of weaning was 5 days for intermittent mandatory ventilation, 4 days for pressure-support ventilation, 3 days for intermittent trials of spontaneous breathing, and 3 days for a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing. After adjusting for covariates, the rate of successful weaning was significantly higher with a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing compared to intermittent mandatory ventilation (rate ratio, 2.83; P<0.006) and pressure-support ventilation (rate ratio, 2.05; P<0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of success between once-daily trials and multiple daily trials of spontaneous breathing. The study concluded that a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing led to extubation about three times faster than intermittent mandatory ventilation and twice as fast as pressure-support ventilation. Multiple daily trials of spontaneous breathing were equally successful.