June 5th, 2015 | Zachary C. Lipton, John Berkowitz, Charles Elkan
This paper provides a critical review of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for sequence learning, highlighting their importance in handling sequential data across various domains such as image captioning, speech synthesis, and time series prediction. RNNs are connectionist models that capture the dynamics of sequences through cycles in the network, retaining a state that can represent information from an arbitrarily long context window. Despite their potential, RNNs have traditionally been difficult to train due to issues like vanishing and exploding gradients, which can hinder the learning of long-range dependencies. Recent advances in network architectures, optimization techniques, and parallel computation have enabled successful large-scale learning with RNNs.
The paper discusses the limitations of standard neural networks, which assume independence among training and test examples, and the advantages of RNNs in modeling sequential data. It compares RNNs to Markov models, explaining why RNNs are more expressive and capable of capturing long-range dependencies. The review covers the history of RNN research, from foundational work in the 1980s to modern architectures like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks (BRNN).
Key contributions of the paper include:
- A detailed explanation of RNNs, including their architecture, training methods, and the challenges they face.
- An overview of early RNN designs, such as the Jordan and Elman networks.
- An in-depth analysis of modern RNN architectures, focusing on LSTM and BRNN.
- A discussion of training techniques, including backpropagation through time (BPTT) and truncated BPTT (TBPTT).
- A comparison of RNNs with other models, such as Markov models and genetic algorithms.
The paper aims to provide a comprehensive and intuitive understanding of RNNs, their historical context, and their practical applications, making it a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field of machine learning.This paper provides a critical review of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for sequence learning, highlighting their importance in handling sequential data across various domains such as image captioning, speech synthesis, and time series prediction. RNNs are connectionist models that capture the dynamics of sequences through cycles in the network, retaining a state that can represent information from an arbitrarily long context window. Despite their potential, RNNs have traditionally been difficult to train due to issues like vanishing and exploding gradients, which can hinder the learning of long-range dependencies. Recent advances in network architectures, optimization techniques, and parallel computation have enabled successful large-scale learning with RNNs.
The paper discusses the limitations of standard neural networks, which assume independence among training and test examples, and the advantages of RNNs in modeling sequential data. It compares RNNs to Markov models, explaining why RNNs are more expressive and capable of capturing long-range dependencies. The review covers the history of RNN research, from foundational work in the 1980s to modern architectures like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks (BRNN).
Key contributions of the paper include:
- A detailed explanation of RNNs, including their architecture, training methods, and the challenges they face.
- An overview of early RNN designs, such as the Jordan and Elman networks.
- An in-depth analysis of modern RNN architectures, focusing on LSTM and BRNN.
- A discussion of training techniques, including backpropagation through time (BPTT) and truncated BPTT (TBPTT).
- A comparison of RNNs with other models, such as Markov models and genetic algorithms.
The paper aims to provide a comprehensive and intuitive understanding of RNNs, their historical context, and their practical applications, making it a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field of machine learning.