2001-10 | Goldstein, Robert S; Ju, Nengjiu; Leland, Hayne E
The article "An EBIT-Based Model of Dynamic Capital Structure" by Robert Goldstein, Nengjiu Ju, and Hayne Leland explores the optimal dynamic capital structure of a firm, considering the option to increase future debt levels. The authors argue that most capital structure models assume static debt choices, while in practice, firms adjust their debt levels in response to changes in firm value. They derive the optimal dynamic capital strategy and investigate the implications for optimal leverage ratios and the tax benefits of debt.
The model is based on the assumption that the value of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is independent of capital structure, which simplifies the analysis. The authors use a log-normal framework for EBIT dynamics, treating all contingent claimants (equity, debt, government) consistently. They derive closed-form expressions for security prices and show that the optimal leverage ratio is lower than in static models, aligning better with empirical observations.
Key findings include:
1. **Optimal Static Capital Structure**: The optimal bankruptcy level and coupon level are derived, showing that equity is a decreasing function of the effective tax rate.
2. **Tax Advantage to Debt**: The tax advantage to debt is calculated, and it is shown that equity is better off with lower taxes.
3. **Equity Pricing with Future Capital Structure Changes**: The value of equity for a firm that commits to optimal capital structure in the future is determined, showing that the tax benefits are embedded in the equity price.
4. **Optimal Upward Dynamic Capital Structure Strategy**: The authors determine the optimal capital structure strategy for a firm with the option to increase future debt levels, finding that there is a range of debt ratios where management will maintain its current debt level, and thresholds for bankruptcy and debt recall.
The model provides a more realistic framework for understanding dynamic capital structure choices and their implications for firm value and tax benefits.The article "An EBIT-Based Model of Dynamic Capital Structure" by Robert Goldstein, Nengjiu Ju, and Hayne Leland explores the optimal dynamic capital structure of a firm, considering the option to increase future debt levels. The authors argue that most capital structure models assume static debt choices, while in practice, firms adjust their debt levels in response to changes in firm value. They derive the optimal dynamic capital strategy and investigate the implications for optimal leverage ratios and the tax benefits of debt.
The model is based on the assumption that the value of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is independent of capital structure, which simplifies the analysis. The authors use a log-normal framework for EBIT dynamics, treating all contingent claimants (equity, debt, government) consistently. They derive closed-form expressions for security prices and show that the optimal leverage ratio is lower than in static models, aligning better with empirical observations.
Key findings include:
1. **Optimal Static Capital Structure**: The optimal bankruptcy level and coupon level are derived, showing that equity is a decreasing function of the effective tax rate.
2. **Tax Advantage to Debt**: The tax advantage to debt is calculated, and it is shown that equity is better off with lower taxes.
3. **Equity Pricing with Future Capital Structure Changes**: The value of equity for a firm that commits to optimal capital structure in the future is determined, showing that the tax benefits are embedded in the equity price.
4. **Optimal Upward Dynamic Capital Structure Strategy**: The authors determine the optimal capital structure strategy for a firm with the option to increase future debt levels, finding that there is a range of debt ratios where management will maintain its current debt level, and thresholds for bankruptcy and debt recall.
The model provides a more realistic framework for understanding dynamic capital structure choices and their implications for firm value and tax benefits.