The text discusses the use of structured clinical examinations (SCEs) in medical education. This method involves students rotating through various stations where they perform specific tasks, such as taking a patient's history or conducting a physical examination. At each station, students are assessed on their performance, and their answers to questions are scored. The SCE aims to provide a more objective and structured assessment of clinical competence compared to traditional methods. It allows for better control over the examination process, clearer definition of assessment goals, and more accurate feedback to students. The examination is conducted in hospital wards, with students moving between stations to perform different tasks. The results are based on both objective questions and examiner assessments. The SCE has been shown to correlate well with written examinations, indicating its effectiveness in assessing clinical skills. The method also allows for more efficient use of examiner time and provides valuable feedback for both students and staff. However, it requires more preparation and may be seen as compartmentalizing the student's knowledge. Despite these challenges, the SCE is considered a valuable tool in medical education for assessing clinical competence objectively.The text discusses the use of structured clinical examinations (SCEs) in medical education. This method involves students rotating through various stations where they perform specific tasks, such as taking a patient's history or conducting a physical examination. At each station, students are assessed on their performance, and their answers to questions are scored. The SCE aims to provide a more objective and structured assessment of clinical competence compared to traditional methods. It allows for better control over the examination process, clearer definition of assessment goals, and more accurate feedback to students. The examination is conducted in hospital wards, with students moving between stations to perform different tasks. The results are based on both objective questions and examiner assessments. The SCE has been shown to correlate well with written examinations, indicating its effectiveness in assessing clinical skills. The method also allows for more efficient use of examiner time and provides valuable feedback for both students and staff. However, it requires more preparation and may be seen as compartmentalizing the student's knowledge. Despite these challenges, the SCE is considered a valuable tool in medical education for assessing clinical competence objectively.