Goldsmiths Research Online (GRO) is the institutional research repository for Goldsmiths, University of London. The article by Zupic and Cater (2015) discusses bibliometric methods in management and organization. These methods use quantitative data to analyze scientific literature, offering objectivity and reducing researcher bias. The paper introduces five bibliometric methods: citation analysis, co-citation analysis, bibliographical coupling, co-author analysis, and co-word analysis. These methods help map research specialties and provide a structured approach for literature reviews. The authors argue that bibliometric methods complement meta-analysis and qualitative reviews by offering a systematic, transparent, and reproducible process. They performed a citation and co-citation analysis on the Organizational Research Methods journal to demonstrate these methods. The paper highlights the growing use of bibliometric methods in management and organization, noting that over half of the studies published in the last three years use these methods. The authors provide a recommended workflow for conducting science mapping studies, emphasizing the importance of defining research questions, selecting appropriate methods, and using bibliometric software. The paper also discusses the limitations of bibliometric methods, including potential biases and the need for careful data selection. The article concludes that bibliometric methods are a valuable tool for researchers, offering a more objective and comprehensive approach to literature reviews.Goldsmiths Research Online (GRO) is the institutional research repository for Goldsmiths, University of London. The article by Zupic and Cater (2015) discusses bibliometric methods in management and organization. These methods use quantitative data to analyze scientific literature, offering objectivity and reducing researcher bias. The paper introduces five bibliometric methods: citation analysis, co-citation analysis, bibliographical coupling, co-author analysis, and co-word analysis. These methods help map research specialties and provide a structured approach for literature reviews. The authors argue that bibliometric methods complement meta-analysis and qualitative reviews by offering a systematic, transparent, and reproducible process. They performed a citation and co-citation analysis on the Organizational Research Methods journal to demonstrate these methods. The paper highlights the growing use of bibliometric methods in management and organization, noting that over half of the studies published in the last three years use these methods. The authors provide a recommended workflow for conducting science mapping studies, emphasizing the importance of defining research questions, selecting appropriate methods, and using bibliometric software. The paper also discusses the limitations of bibliometric methods, including potential biases and the need for careful data selection. The article concludes that bibliometric methods are a valuable tool for researchers, offering a more objective and comprehensive approach to literature reviews.