Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries

Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries

1999-03-01 | Rauch, James E; Evans, Peter B.
Rauch and Evans (1999) examine the relationship between bureaucratic structure and performance in less developed countries (LDCs). They argue that effective state bureaucracies are characterized by competitive salaries, internal promotion, and meritocratic recruitment. Using data from 35 LDCs, they find that these structural features significantly influence ratings of bureaucratic performance from three country risk agencies. Meritocratic recruitment is the most important factor, followed by internal promotion and career stability. Competitive salaries have less clear effects. The study highlights the importance of institutional reforms that promote professionalism and efficiency in state bureaucracies. The findings suggest that improving bureaucratic performance can enhance economic growth and private investment. The authors also note that their results are robust to various tests, including the inclusion of control variables and alternative measures of economic development. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on the role of institutions in economic development.Rauch and Evans (1999) examine the relationship between bureaucratic structure and performance in less developed countries (LDCs). They argue that effective state bureaucracies are characterized by competitive salaries, internal promotion, and meritocratic recruitment. Using data from 35 LDCs, they find that these structural features significantly influence ratings of bureaucratic performance from three country risk agencies. Meritocratic recruitment is the most important factor, followed by internal promotion and career stability. Competitive salaries have less clear effects. The study highlights the importance of institutional reforms that promote professionalism and efficiency in state bureaucracies. The findings suggest that improving bureaucratic performance can enhance economic growth and private investment. The authors also note that their results are robust to various tests, including the inclusion of control variables and alternative measures of economic development. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on the role of institutions in economic development.
Reach us at info@study.space