ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

2012 | Stephen G. Landt, Georgi K. Marinov, Anshul Kundaje, Pouya Kheradpour, Florencio Pauli, Serafim Batzoglou, Bradley E. Bernstein, Peter Bickel, James B. Brown, Philip Cayting, Yiwen Chen, Gilberto DeSalvo, Charles Epstein, Katherine I. Fisher-Aylor, Ghia Euskirchen, Mark Gerstein, Jason Gertz, Alexander J. Hartemink, Michael M. Hoffman, Vishwanthan R. Iyer, Youngsook L. Jung, Subhradip Karmakar, Manolis Kellis, Peter V. Kharchenko, Qunhua Li, Tao Liu, X. Shirley Liu, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Richard M. Myers, Peter J. Park, Michael J. Pazin, Marc D. Perry, Debasish Raha, Timothy E. Reddy, Joel Rozowsky, Noam Shorsh, Arend Sidow, Matthew Slattery, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Michael Y. Tolstorukov, Kevin P. White, Simon Xi, Peggy J. Farnham, Jason D. Lieb, Barbara J. Wold, and Michael Snyder
The ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed guidelines and standards for ChIP-seq experiments to ensure consistency, quality, and utility of data. These guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data reporting, and data quality assessment. They emphasize immunoprecipitation specificity, DNA sequencing depth, data scoring, control experiments, biological replication, and data reporting. The ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have performed over 1,000 ChIP-seq experiments across more than 100 cell types in four organisms, using multiple pipelines. They have developed quality metrics and standards for antibody characterization, including immunoblot assays, mass spectrometry, and motif analysis. They also emphasize the importance of biological replication and sequencing depth for accurate site discovery. The guidelines also include methods for evaluating ChIP-seq data quality, such as FRiP (fraction of reads in peaks), cross-correlation analysis, and IDR (irreproducible discovery rate). These metrics help assess the reproducibility and reliability of ChIP-seq experiments. The ENCODE and modENCODE consortia also provide detailed data and experimental details for data sharing and reproducibility. The guidelines are updated regularly and are available for public access. The standards and practices are designed to ensure that ChIP-seq data is reliable, reproducible, and useful for a wide range of biological applications.The ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed guidelines and standards for ChIP-seq experiments to ensure consistency, quality, and utility of data. These guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data reporting, and data quality assessment. They emphasize immunoprecipitation specificity, DNA sequencing depth, data scoring, control experiments, biological replication, and data reporting. The ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have performed over 1,000 ChIP-seq experiments across more than 100 cell types in four organisms, using multiple pipelines. They have developed quality metrics and standards for antibody characterization, including immunoblot assays, mass spectrometry, and motif analysis. They also emphasize the importance of biological replication and sequencing depth for accurate site discovery. The guidelines also include methods for evaluating ChIP-seq data quality, such as FRiP (fraction of reads in peaks), cross-correlation analysis, and IDR (irreproducible discovery rate). These metrics help assess the reproducibility and reliability of ChIP-seq experiments. The ENCODE and modENCODE consortia also provide detailed data and experimental details for data sharing and reproducibility. The guidelines are updated regularly and are available for public access. The standards and practices are designed to ensure that ChIP-seq data is reliable, reproducible, and useful for a wide range of biological applications.
Reach us at info@study.space
Understanding ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia