Comparison of Sequencing Utility Programs

Comparison of Sequencing Utility Programs

2013 | Erik Aronesty
The article by Erik Aronesty from Expression Analysis, Inc. discusses the performance and efficiency of two custom tools, fastq-mcf and fastq-join, designed for adapter trimming and paired-end joining in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data. The author compares these tools to similar open-source utilities, focusing on resource efficiency and effectiveness. **Adapter Clipping:** - Adapter clipping is crucial for removing adapter sequences that can interfere with variant calling and assembly. - Fastq-mcf and fastq-join use a novel scoring algorithm based on Hamming distance, which is optimized for the Illumina platform. - These tools achieve high sensitivity and speed by selecting the minimum scoring alignment, allowing for better matches while avoiding spurious short, exact matches. **Paired-End Joining:** - Paired-end joining is used to improve alignment specificity and for applications like transcriptome determination. - Fastq-join and SeqPrep are the only tools that maintain high specificity while keeping false negative rates low. - The choice of parameters is critical for both tasks, as inappropriate settings can lead to poor performance. **Performance Analysis:** - Fastq-mcf and fastq-join perform well in terms of false positive and false negative rates, with fastq-mcf showing particularly strong performance in minimizing false negatives. - These tools are also highly efficient, capable of processing over 100K reads per second. **Conclusion:** - Fastq-mcf and fastq-join outperform other available methods in terms of both performance and efficiency, especially in scenarios where false negatives are a primary concern. - The novel scoring algorithm used in these tools is particularly effective for low-error sequencing technologies. The article emphasizes the importance of careful parameter selection for sequencing preprocessing tools and highlights the advantages of using Hamming-distance scoring schemes over Smith-Waterman alignment for tasks like adapter removal and paired-end joining.The article by Erik Aronesty from Expression Analysis, Inc. discusses the performance and efficiency of two custom tools, fastq-mcf and fastq-join, designed for adapter trimming and paired-end joining in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data. The author compares these tools to similar open-source utilities, focusing on resource efficiency and effectiveness. **Adapter Clipping:** - Adapter clipping is crucial for removing adapter sequences that can interfere with variant calling and assembly. - Fastq-mcf and fastq-join use a novel scoring algorithm based on Hamming distance, which is optimized for the Illumina platform. - These tools achieve high sensitivity and speed by selecting the minimum scoring alignment, allowing for better matches while avoiding spurious short, exact matches. **Paired-End Joining:** - Paired-end joining is used to improve alignment specificity and for applications like transcriptome determination. - Fastq-join and SeqPrep are the only tools that maintain high specificity while keeping false negative rates low. - The choice of parameters is critical for both tasks, as inappropriate settings can lead to poor performance. **Performance Analysis:** - Fastq-mcf and fastq-join perform well in terms of false positive and false negative rates, with fastq-mcf showing particularly strong performance in minimizing false negatives. - These tools are also highly efficient, capable of processing over 100K reads per second. **Conclusion:** - Fastq-mcf and fastq-join outperform other available methods in terms of both performance and efficiency, especially in scenarios where false negatives are a primary concern. - The novel scoring algorithm used in these tools is particularly effective for low-error sequencing technologies. The article emphasizes the importance of careful parameter selection for sequencing preprocessing tools and highlights the advantages of using Hamming-distance scoring schemes over Smith-Waterman alignment for tasks like adapter removal and paired-end joining.
Reach us at info@study.space
Understanding Comparison of Sequencing Utility Programs