This paper analyzes 114 circular economy (CE) definitions to clarify current understandings of the concept. The study finds that CE is most frequently described as a combination of reduce, reuse, and recycle activities, but often lacks emphasis on the need for a systemic shift. Definitions show few explicit links to sustainable development, with economic prosperity being the main aim, followed by environmental quality. Social equity and future generations are rarely mentioned. Business models and consumers are not frequently outlined as enablers of CE. The study highlights the lack of consensus on CE definitions, which may hinder the concept's coherence. The research shows that many definitions focus on the 3R framework (reduce, reuse, recycle) and the waste hierarchy, but few include a systems perspective or address social equity and future generations. The study recommends including these elements in CE definitions to ensure a holistic understanding. The paper concludes that CE needs to be understood as a fundamental systemic change rather than a minor adjustment to the status quo. The study emphasizes the importance of clarity in CE definitions to avoid confusion and ensure the concept's effectiveness in promoting sustainable development.This paper analyzes 114 circular economy (CE) definitions to clarify current understandings of the concept. The study finds that CE is most frequently described as a combination of reduce, reuse, and recycle activities, but often lacks emphasis on the need for a systemic shift. Definitions show few explicit links to sustainable development, with economic prosperity being the main aim, followed by environmental quality. Social equity and future generations are rarely mentioned. Business models and consumers are not frequently outlined as enablers of CE. The study highlights the lack of consensus on CE definitions, which may hinder the concept's coherence. The research shows that many definitions focus on the 3R framework (reduce, reuse, recycle) and the waste hierarchy, but few include a systems perspective or address social equity and future generations. The study recommends including these elements in CE definitions to ensure a holistic understanding. The paper concludes that CE needs to be understood as a fundamental systemic change rather than a minor adjustment to the status quo. The study emphasizes the importance of clarity in CE definitions to avoid confusion and ensure the concept's effectiveness in promoting sustainable development.