The passage discusses the shortcomings of a geological guide for urban development, emphasizing the need for an attractive, concise, and easy-to-use publication. The authors' lack of understanding in presenting geological information to laypeople is highlighted, including the absence of a geological section on Edmonton's subsurface and a comprehensive glossary of geological terms. The review also criticizes the authors' provincial bias, as most references are from Alberta, and the lack of mention of the Saskatoon Folio, a pioneering Canadian publication in urban geology. Despite the significant effort put into the bulletin, these issues detract from its potential to foster a broader appreciation of urban geology. The review concludes by suggesting that the authors could improve the publication by presenting the information in a different, more accessible format.The passage discusses the shortcomings of a geological guide for urban development, emphasizing the need for an attractive, concise, and easy-to-use publication. The authors' lack of understanding in presenting geological information to laypeople is highlighted, including the absence of a geological section on Edmonton's subsurface and a comprehensive glossary of geological terms. The review also criticizes the authors' provincial bias, as most references are from Alberta, and the lack of mention of the Saskatoon Folio, a pioneering Canadian publication in urban geology. Despite the significant effort put into the bulletin, these issues detract from its potential to foster a broader appreciation of urban geology. The review concludes by suggesting that the authors could improve the publication by presenting the information in a different, more accessible format.