Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial

Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial

17 May 2024 | A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper
The SPHERE Per-AF trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. The study was a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial involving 420 patients. The primary composite effectiveness endpoint, which included freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation, arrhythmia recurrence, and drug initiation or escalation, was observed in 73.8% of patients in the investigational group and 65.8% in the control group (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). The primary safety endpoint, which included serious procedure-related or device-related adverse events, occurred in 1.4% of patients in the investigational group and 1.0% in the control group (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). Procedural times were shorter in the investigational group (P < 0.0001). The dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system demonstrated non-inferior safety and effectiveness compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation, with improved procedural efficiency. Future studies are needed to further evaluate the broader population of patients with AF.The SPHERE Per-AF trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. The study was a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial involving 420 patients. The primary composite effectiveness endpoint, which included freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation, arrhythmia recurrence, and drug initiation or escalation, was observed in 73.8% of patients in the investigational group and 65.8% in the control group (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). The primary safety endpoint, which included serious procedure-related or device-related adverse events, occurred in 1.4% of patients in the investigational group and 1.0% in the control group (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). Procedural times were shorter in the investigational group (P < 0.0001). The dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system demonstrated non-inferior safety and effectiveness compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation, with improved procedural efficiency. Future studies are needed to further evaluate the broader population of patients with AF.
Reach us at info@study.space