Early Use of Erenumab vs Nonspecific Oral Migraine Preventives: The APPRAISE Randomized Clinical Trial

Early Use of Erenumab vs Nonspecific Oral Migraine Preventives: The APPRAISE Randomized Clinical Trial

May 2024 | Patricia Pozo-Rosich, MD, PhD; David Dolezil, MD; Koen Paemeleire, MD; Adam Stepień, MD; Philipp Stude, MD; Josefín Snellman, PhD; Michal Arkuszewski, MD, PhD; Tracy Stites, PhD; Shannon Ritter, MS; Cristina Lopez Lopez, MD, PhD; Jeff Maca, PhD; Matias Ferraris, DVM; Raquel Gil-Gouvea, MD, PhD
The APPRAISE trial compared erenumab with nonspecific oral migraine preventives (OMPMs) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments. The study found that erenumab was significantly more effective, better tolerated, and led to better adherence compared to OMPMs. At 12 months, 56.2% of patients on erenumab achieved a 50% or greater reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), compared to 16.8% on OMPMs. Erenumab also showed a higher responder rate on the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, with 76.0% of patients reporting improvement versus 18.8% on OMPMs. Erenumab also resulted in a greater reduction in cumulative average MMDs (-4.32 days) compared to OMPMs (-2.65 days). Fewer patients on erenumab switched medications or discontinued treatment due to adverse events. No new safety signals were identified. The study highlights that earlier use of erenumab provides sustained efficacy, safety, and adherence, making it a better option than OMPMs for patients with EM who have failed previous treatments. The findings support the use of erenumab as a first-line treatment for migraine prevention.The APPRAISE trial compared erenumab with nonspecific oral migraine preventives (OMPMs) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments. The study found that erenumab was significantly more effective, better tolerated, and led to better adherence compared to OMPMs. At 12 months, 56.2% of patients on erenumab achieved a 50% or greater reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), compared to 16.8% on OMPMs. Erenumab also showed a higher responder rate on the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, with 76.0% of patients reporting improvement versus 18.8% on OMPMs. Erenumab also resulted in a greater reduction in cumulative average MMDs (-4.32 days) compared to OMPMs (-2.65 days). Fewer patients on erenumab switched medications or discontinued treatment due to adverse events. No new safety signals were identified. The study highlights that earlier use of erenumab provides sustained efficacy, safety, and adherence, making it a better option than OMPMs for patients with EM who have failed previous treatments. The findings support the use of erenumab as a first-line treatment for migraine prevention.
Reach us at info@study.space