2024 | Julie Koch Sheard, Tim Adriaens, Diana E. Bowler, Andrea Büermann, Corey T. Callaghan, Elodie C. M. Camprasse, Shawan Chowdhury, Thore Engel, Elizabeth A. Finch, Julia von Gönner, Pen-Yuan Hsing, Peter Mikula, Rui Ying Rachel Oh, Birte Peters, Shyam S. Phartyal, Michael J. O. Pocock, Jana Wäldchen, and Aletta Bonn
Emerging technologies are increasingly used in environmental citizen science projects, offering benefits for both scientists and participants. Citizen science supports large-scale, long-term monitoring of species occurrences, behavior, and interactions. Technologies can engage participants regardless of prior taxonomic expertise, enabling new data collection. However, they may increase costs, require technical expertise, or reduce direct engagement with nature. This article discusses how current technologies have increased citizen science projects and how emerging technologies can enhance scientific impact and public engagement. Technology can facilitate existing efforts, enable new research, transform science, policy, and public participation, or inhibit participation, equity, and scientific rigor. Rapid technological development offers exciting opportunities for citizen science and insect monitoring, but risks must be managed.
The article highlights the role of technology in citizen science, including smartphone apps, social media, and emerging technologies like computer vision, acoustic monitoring, and molecular methods. A survey of 70 respondents from various regions found that technologies like cameras, smartphones, and apps are widely used. Respondents generally supported the use of technology in citizen science, believing it improves data quality and engagement. However, they were less certain about its ability to increase participation or engagement with nature. The article also discusses the potential of technologies to enable new research avenues, such as using environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and molecular methods for biodiversity monitoring. Technologies like lidar, radar, and photonic sensors are being used to monitor insect behavior and movements, while AI and machine learning are improving species identification and data processing.
Technology can also pose challenges, such as increasing costs, creating barriers for participants, and potentially exacerbating data biases. The article emphasizes the importance of equitable access to technology, particularly for underrepresented groups. Open-source technologies are recommended to ensure inclusivity and reduce costs. The future of citizen science and insect monitoring should focus on diverse, inclusive approaches that consider local contexts and needs. Technology should complement, rather than replace, traditional methods, ensuring that all participants can contribute meaningfully to scientific research. The article concludes that while technology offers many opportunities, careful consideration of its impacts is essential to ensure equitable and effective citizen science.Emerging technologies are increasingly used in environmental citizen science projects, offering benefits for both scientists and participants. Citizen science supports large-scale, long-term monitoring of species occurrences, behavior, and interactions. Technologies can engage participants regardless of prior taxonomic expertise, enabling new data collection. However, they may increase costs, require technical expertise, or reduce direct engagement with nature. This article discusses how current technologies have increased citizen science projects and how emerging technologies can enhance scientific impact and public engagement. Technology can facilitate existing efforts, enable new research, transform science, policy, and public participation, or inhibit participation, equity, and scientific rigor. Rapid technological development offers exciting opportunities for citizen science and insect monitoring, but risks must be managed.
The article highlights the role of technology in citizen science, including smartphone apps, social media, and emerging technologies like computer vision, acoustic monitoring, and molecular methods. A survey of 70 respondents from various regions found that technologies like cameras, smartphones, and apps are widely used. Respondents generally supported the use of technology in citizen science, believing it improves data quality and engagement. However, they were less certain about its ability to increase participation or engagement with nature. The article also discusses the potential of technologies to enable new research avenues, such as using environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and molecular methods for biodiversity monitoring. Technologies like lidar, radar, and photonic sensors are being used to monitor insect behavior and movements, while AI and machine learning are improving species identification and data processing.
Technology can also pose challenges, such as increasing costs, creating barriers for participants, and potentially exacerbating data biases. The article emphasizes the importance of equitable access to technology, particularly for underrepresented groups. Open-source technologies are recommended to ensure inclusivity and reduce costs. The future of citizen science and insect monitoring should focus on diverse, inclusive approaches that consider local contexts and needs. Technology should complement, rather than replace, traditional methods, ensuring that all participants can contribute meaningfully to scientific research. The article concludes that while technology offers many opportunities, careful consideration of its impacts is essential to ensure equitable and effective citizen science.