The article "Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine" acknowledges the contributions of numerous scientists and scholars who have reviewed papers to enhance the rigor of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). These reviewers have provided valuable feedback, helping to establish a solid evidence base for CAM. The names of those who have reviewed five or more papers are highlighted with a star. The list includes a wide range of researchers from various countries and disciplines, reflecting the global effort to improve the scientific validity of CAM practices. Their anonymous contributions are crucial in ensuring that CAM is evaluated through a rigorous, evidence-based framework. The recognition of their work underscores the importance of peer review in advancing the credibility and acceptance of CAM within the scientific community. The list of reviewers is extensive, with many individuals noted for their significant contributions to the field. This collaborative effort highlights the commitment of the scientific community to promoting high-quality research in CAM, ensuring that it meets the standards of evidence-based medicine. The inclusion of both well-known and less familiar names reflects the diversity of expertise and the collaborative nature of this endeavor. The article serves as a tribute to the reviewers' dedication and their role in shaping the future of CAM research.The article "Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine" acknowledges the contributions of numerous scientists and scholars who have reviewed papers to enhance the rigor of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). These reviewers have provided valuable feedback, helping to establish a solid evidence base for CAM. The names of those who have reviewed five or more papers are highlighted with a star. The list includes a wide range of researchers from various countries and disciplines, reflecting the global effort to improve the scientific validity of CAM practices. Their anonymous contributions are crucial in ensuring that CAM is evaluated through a rigorous, evidence-based framework. The recognition of their work underscores the importance of peer review in advancing the credibility and acceptance of CAM within the scientific community. The list of reviewers is extensive, with many individuals noted for their significant contributions to the field. This collaborative effort highlights the commitment of the scientific community to promoting high-quality research in CAM, ensuring that it meets the standards of evidence-based medicine. The inclusion of both well-known and less familiar names reflects the diversity of expertise and the collaborative nature of this endeavor. The article serves as a tribute to the reviewers' dedication and their role in shaping the future of CAM research.