Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems

Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems

2011 June ; 9(6): 467–477 | Kira S. Makarova, Daniel H. Haft, Rodolphe Barrangou, Stan J. J. Brouns, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Philippe Horvath, Sylvain Moineau, Francisco J. M. Mojica, Yuri I. Wolf, Alexander F. Yakunin, John van der Oost, Eugene V. Koonin
The CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) systems are adaptive immunity mechanisms present in many archaea and bacteria. These systems consist of *cas* genes and unique spacers, with diverse architectures and high rates of evolution. This review provides an updated analysis of the evolutionary relationships between CRISPR-Cas systems and Cas proteins, delineating three major types and several subtypes. Given the complexity and dynamic evolution of these systems, a unified classification should integrate multiple criteria, including phylogenies of *cas* genes, sequence and organization of CRISPR repeats, and CRISPR-Cas locus architecture. The authors propose a 'polythetic' classification that combines these criteria. The review also discusses outstanding problems in CRISPR-Cas classification and nomenclature, emphasizing the need for continuous updates and revisions based on new sequence and structural data.The CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) systems are adaptive immunity mechanisms present in many archaea and bacteria. These systems consist of *cas* genes and unique spacers, with diverse architectures and high rates of evolution. This review provides an updated analysis of the evolutionary relationships between CRISPR-Cas systems and Cas proteins, delineating three major types and several subtypes. Given the complexity and dynamic evolution of these systems, a unified classification should integrate multiple criteria, including phylogenies of *cas* genes, sequence and organization of CRISPR repeats, and CRISPR-Cas locus architecture. The authors propose a 'polythetic' classification that combines these criteria. The review also discusses outstanding problems in CRISPR-Cas classification and nomenclature, emphasizing the need for continuous updates and revisions based on new sequence and structural data.
Reach us at info@study.space
Understanding Evolution and classification of the CRISPR%E2%80%93Cas systems