The article by Kim V. L. England explores the ethical and methodological challenges of conducting feminist and poststructuralist research, particularly in the field of geography. England argues that traditional objectivist social science methods, which emphasize detachment and neutrality, are inadequate for understanding the complexities of social life, especially when dealing with marginalized groups like lesbians. She emphasizes the importance of reflexivity and positionality, suggesting that researchers must be more reflective about their own biases and power dynamics in the research process. England discusses her own experiences conducting a research project on lesbians in Toronto, highlighting the ethical dilemmas and power imbalances that arise. She concludes that while reflexivity can increase awareness of these issues, it cannot eliminate them. Instead, researchers must recognize the partial and situated nature of their understanding and strive for more inclusive and flexible methodologies that are sensitive to the power relations inherent in fieldwork.The article by Kim V. L. England explores the ethical and methodological challenges of conducting feminist and poststructuralist research, particularly in the field of geography. England argues that traditional objectivist social science methods, which emphasize detachment and neutrality, are inadequate for understanding the complexities of social life, especially when dealing with marginalized groups like lesbians. She emphasizes the importance of reflexivity and positionality, suggesting that researchers must be more reflective about their own biases and power dynamics in the research process. England discusses her own experiences conducting a research project on lesbians in Toronto, highlighting the ethical dilemmas and power imbalances that arise. She concludes that while reflexivity can increase awareness of these issues, it cannot eliminate them. Instead, researchers must recognize the partial and situated nature of their understanding and strive for more inclusive and flexible methodologies that are sensitive to the power relations inherent in fieldwork.