May 18, 1995 | THEODORE E. WARKENTIN, M.D., MARK N. LEVINE, M.D., JACK HIRSH, M.D., PETER HORSEWOOD, PH.D., ROBIN S. ROBERTS, M.TECH., MICHAEL GENT, D.Sc., AND JOHN G. KELTON, M.D.
This study investigates the frequency and clinical outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) after hip surgery. The researchers conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 665 patients, comparing the two types of heparin. HIT was defined as a platelet count below 150,000 per cubic millimeter five or more days after heparin therapy, plus a positive test for heparin-dependent IgG antibodies.
Key findings include:
- HIT occurred in 2.7% of patients receiving UFH, compared to 0% of those receiving LMWH.
- HIT was strongly associated with thrombotic events, particularly venous thrombosis.
- In the subgroup of 387 patients tested for heparin-dependent IgG antibodies, 20 patients tested positive, with a higher frequency in those receiving UFH.
- HIT was a significant risk factor for thrombotic complications, with an overall frequency of 2.4% associated with thrombosis.
The study suggests that HIT and its associated thrombotic complications are relatively common adverse effects of heparin therapy, and that LMWH is associated with a lower risk of HIT and thrombotic events compared to UFH. However, LMWH is not indicated for treating HIT due to cross-reactivity between the two forms of heparin.This study investigates the frequency and clinical outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) after hip surgery. The researchers conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 665 patients, comparing the two types of heparin. HIT was defined as a platelet count below 150,000 per cubic millimeter five or more days after heparin therapy, plus a positive test for heparin-dependent IgG antibodies.
Key findings include:
- HIT occurred in 2.7% of patients receiving UFH, compared to 0% of those receiving LMWH.
- HIT was strongly associated with thrombotic events, particularly venous thrombosis.
- In the subgroup of 387 patients tested for heparin-dependent IgG antibodies, 20 patients tested positive, with a higher frequency in those receiving UFH.
- HIT was a significant risk factor for thrombotic complications, with an overall frequency of 2.4% associated with thrombosis.
The study suggests that HIT and its associated thrombotic complications are relatively common adverse effects of heparin therapy, and that LMWH is associated with a lower risk of HIT and thrombotic events compared to UFH. However, LMWH is not indicated for treating HIT due to cross-reactivity between the two forms of heparin.