Higher Education’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania

Higher Education’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania

30 April 2024 | Dr Jürgen Rudolph, Dr Mohamed Fadhil Bin Mohamed Ismail, Dr Stefan Popenici
The article "Higher Education’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania" by Dr. Jürgen Rudolph, Dr. Mohamed Fadhil Bin Mohamed Ismail, and Dr. Stefan Popenici explores the complex landscape of opportunities and threats that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) introduces to higher education. The authors argue that while GenAI offers significant potential in enhancing pedagogy, research, administration, and student support, it also raises concerns around academic integrity, labor displacement, embedded biases, environmental sustainability, increased commercialization, and regulatory gaps. They advocate for the development of critical AI literacy among educators and students, emphasizing the need for responsible innovation and informed use of AI. The successful integration of AI in higher education must be grounded in ethics, equity, and the prioritization of educational aims and human values. The article delves into ten opportunities and ten threats associated with GenAI, providing a nuanced exploration of the issues to contribute to the ongoing discourse on how higher education institutions can navigate the rise of GenAI, ensuring that technological advancements benefit all stakeholders while upholding core academic values.The article "Higher Education’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania" by Dr. Jürgen Rudolph, Dr. Mohamed Fadhil Bin Mohamed Ismail, and Dr. Stefan Popenici explores the complex landscape of opportunities and threats that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) introduces to higher education. The authors argue that while GenAI offers significant potential in enhancing pedagogy, research, administration, and student support, it also raises concerns around academic integrity, labor displacement, embedded biases, environmental sustainability, increased commercialization, and regulatory gaps. They advocate for the development of critical AI literacy among educators and students, emphasizing the need for responsible innovation and informed use of AI. The successful integration of AI in higher education must be grounded in ethics, equity, and the prioritization of educational aims and human values. The article delves into ten opportunities and ten threats associated with GenAI, providing a nuanced exploration of the issues to contribute to the ongoing discourse on how higher education institutions can navigate the rise of GenAI, ensuring that technological advancements benefit all stakeholders while upholding core academic values.
Reach us at info@study.space
Understanding Higher Education%E2%80%99s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox%3A The Meaning of Chatbot Mania