May 1990 | Frances C. James and Charles E. McCulloch
The article "Multivariate Analysis in Ecology and Systematics: Panacea or Pandora's Box?" by Frances C. James and Charles E. McCulloch explores the role of multivariate analysis in ecological and systematic studies. The authors highlight the increasing importance of multivariate methods in understanding complex data sets, particularly in ecology and systematics. They argue that without a basic understanding of multivariate analysis, researchers risk misinterpreting data and hindering scientific progress.
The article reviews 20 major summaries of recent applications of multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics, noting a significant increase in the use of these methods between 1978 and 1988. It emphasizes the need for researchers to understand the objectives and limitations of various multivariate techniques to avoid common pitfalls such as misinterpretation and overinterpretation of results.
Key topics discussed include:
1. **Multicollinearity**: The authors critique the common belief that removing correlations among variables can clarify their relative importance, arguing that this confusion stems from misaligned objectives between the method and the researcher.
2. **Indirect Ordinations in Plant Ecology**: They address the challenges of analyzing data from species occurrences in vegetation stands, noting that the arch pattern often seen in bivariate plots is not an artifact but a natural outcome of species responses to environmental gradients.
3. **Shape Variables in Morphometrics**: The authors advocate for the direct study of shape variables, which are ratios and proportions, emphasizing the need to consider their special properties.
The article also provides a comprehensive overview of various multivariate methods, including multiple regression, principal components analysis, linear discriminant function analysis, and canonical correlation, among others. It discusses the strengths and limitations of each method and offers practical advice on their application.
Overall, the authors conclude that while multivariate analysis can be a powerful tool for ecological and systematic research, it must be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation and overinterpretation of data. They emphasize the importance of combining multivariate statistics with biological knowledge and experimental design to ensure reliable and meaningful results.The article "Multivariate Analysis in Ecology and Systematics: Panacea or Pandora's Box?" by Frances C. James and Charles E. McCulloch explores the role of multivariate analysis in ecological and systematic studies. The authors highlight the increasing importance of multivariate methods in understanding complex data sets, particularly in ecology and systematics. They argue that without a basic understanding of multivariate analysis, researchers risk misinterpreting data and hindering scientific progress.
The article reviews 20 major summaries of recent applications of multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics, noting a significant increase in the use of these methods between 1978 and 1988. It emphasizes the need for researchers to understand the objectives and limitations of various multivariate techniques to avoid common pitfalls such as misinterpretation and overinterpretation of results.
Key topics discussed include:
1. **Multicollinearity**: The authors critique the common belief that removing correlations among variables can clarify their relative importance, arguing that this confusion stems from misaligned objectives between the method and the researcher.
2. **Indirect Ordinations in Plant Ecology**: They address the challenges of analyzing data from species occurrences in vegetation stands, noting that the arch pattern often seen in bivariate plots is not an artifact but a natural outcome of species responses to environmental gradients.
3. **Shape Variables in Morphometrics**: The authors advocate for the direct study of shape variables, which are ratios and proportions, emphasizing the need to consider their special properties.
The article also provides a comprehensive overview of various multivariate methods, including multiple regression, principal components analysis, linear discriminant function analysis, and canonical correlation, among others. It discusses the strengths and limitations of each method and offers practical advice on their application.
Overall, the authors conclude that while multivariate analysis can be a powerful tool for ecological and systematic research, it must be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation and overinterpretation of data. They emphasize the importance of combining multivariate statistics with biological knowledge and experimental design to ensure reliable and meaningful results.