Flexibility is essential in training as it allows safe use of a wide range of movements. In sports like gymnastics, flexibility is a key training priority. Assessing flexibility is challenging due to the complexity of movement, but controlled measurements with goniometers can provide useful data. Standardized assessments are crucial for reliable results. The "four principles plus scope" approach provides a neutral framework for ethical decision-making in healthcare. It includes respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, along with consideration of their scope. These principles help healthcare workers make decisions in complex ethical situations. Respect for autonomy involves respecting patients' right to make decisions about their care. This includes obtaining informed consent, maintaining confidentiality, and avoiding deception. Good communication is essential to ensure patients understand their options and feel respected. Beneficence and non-maleficence require healthcare workers to aim for net benefit while minimizing harm. This involves careful consideration of risks and benefits, and ensuring that treatments are effective and appropriate for each patient. Empowerment is a concept that combines beneficence and respect for autonomy to help patients make informed decisions. Justice involves fair distribution of resources and respect for people's rights and laws. It requires balancing competing moral concerns, such as equal access to care and the needs of different groups. Healthcare workers must navigate these issues carefully, considering the broader societal context. Healthcare workers must make decisions based on their own values and the values of their organization or society. They must avoid personal bias, ensure cost-effective treatment, and respect patients' rights. They must also comply with morally acceptable laws and consider the broader implications of their decisions. Organizational, professional, and societal decisions require careful consideration of competing moral concerns. There is no simple solution to complex ethical issues, and healthcare workers must seek gradual improvements in their approaches. They must accept that some decisions will not fully satisfy all parties, and that justice involves balancing competing claims. The scope of moral obligations can vary, and healthcare workers must consider who or what they are responsible to. This includes patients, clients, and the broader community. They must respect the autonomy of even young children and severely mentally impaired individuals unless there are strong moral reasons not to. The right to life is a complex issue, involving questions about who has the right to life and how it should be balanced against other considerations. Healthcare workers must navigate these issues carefully, considering the broader implications of their decisions. The "four principles plus scope" approach provides a common framework for ethical decision-making in healthcare. It is neutral between different moral, religious, and philosophical views and can be used by healthcare workers from diverse backgrounds. It is an important moral tool that should not be rejected lightly.Flexibility is essential in training as it allows safe use of a wide range of movements. In sports like gymnastics, flexibility is a key training priority. Assessing flexibility is challenging due to the complexity of movement, but controlled measurements with goniometers can provide useful data. Standardized assessments are crucial for reliable results. The "four principles plus scope" approach provides a neutral framework for ethical decision-making in healthcare. It includes respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, along with consideration of their scope. These principles help healthcare workers make decisions in complex ethical situations. Respect for autonomy involves respecting patients' right to make decisions about their care. This includes obtaining informed consent, maintaining confidentiality, and avoiding deception. Good communication is essential to ensure patients understand their options and feel respected. Beneficence and non-maleficence require healthcare workers to aim for net benefit while minimizing harm. This involves careful consideration of risks and benefits, and ensuring that treatments are effective and appropriate for each patient. Empowerment is a concept that combines beneficence and respect for autonomy to help patients make informed decisions. Justice involves fair distribution of resources and respect for people's rights and laws. It requires balancing competing moral concerns, such as equal access to care and the needs of different groups. Healthcare workers must navigate these issues carefully, considering the broader societal context. Healthcare workers must make decisions based on their own values and the values of their organization or society. They must avoid personal bias, ensure cost-effective treatment, and respect patients' rights. They must also comply with morally acceptable laws and consider the broader implications of their decisions. Organizational, professional, and societal decisions require careful consideration of competing moral concerns. There is no simple solution to complex ethical issues, and healthcare workers must seek gradual improvements in their approaches. They must accept that some decisions will not fully satisfy all parties, and that justice involves balancing competing claims. The scope of moral obligations can vary, and healthcare workers must consider who or what they are responsible to. This includes patients, clients, and the broader community. They must respect the autonomy of even young children and severely mentally impaired individuals unless there are strong moral reasons not to. The right to life is a complex issue, involving questions about who has the right to life and how it should be balanced against other considerations. Healthcare workers must navigate these issues carefully, considering the broader implications of their decisions. The "four principles plus scope" approach provides a common framework for ethical decision-making in healthcare. It is neutral between different moral, religious, and philosophical views and can be used by healthcare workers from diverse backgrounds. It is an important moral tool that should not be rejected lightly.