09 April 2024 | Martin Lauss12, Bengt Phung12, Troels Holz Borch3, Katja Harbst12, Kamila Kaminska12, Anna Ebbesson12, Ingrid Hedenfalk12, Joan Yuan4, Kari Nielsen2,5, Christian Ingvar6, Ana Carneiro17, Karolin Isaksson2,6,8, Kristian Pietras2,9, Inge Marie Svane3, Marco Donia3,10 & Göran Jönsson1,2,10
This study investigates the molecular and immune cell landscape in melanoma metastases that progress on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, focusing on both anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 resistance. The authors collected biopsies from 44 patients with melanoma who progressed on either anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 monotherapy. They found that genetic alterations in antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways were observed in approximately 25% of ICB-resistant cases. Anti-CTLA4-resistant lesions showed a sustained immune response, including immune-regulatory features, while anti-PD1-resistant lesions had a distinct immune cell niche but were generally immune-poor with non-expanded T cell receptor (TCR) clones. The study also revealed that anti-PD1-resistant tumors had reduced fractions of PD1+ CD8+ T cells compared to ICB-naïve metastases. Additionally, the authors performed transcriptomic and spatial analyses to explore the differences in immune transcriptional programs and tumor cell states between anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 resistant melanomas. They found that anti-CTLA4-resistant tumors had a higher number of expanded TCR clones and an increased abundance of FOXP3+ T regulatory cells, while anti-PD1-resistant tumors had a higher frequency of bystander CD8+ T cells that did not express PD1. These findings highlight the complexity of ICB resistance and the distinct mechanisms underlying resistance to anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 therapies.This study investigates the molecular and immune cell landscape in melanoma metastases that progress on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, focusing on both anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 resistance. The authors collected biopsies from 44 patients with melanoma who progressed on either anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 monotherapy. They found that genetic alterations in antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways were observed in approximately 25% of ICB-resistant cases. Anti-CTLA4-resistant lesions showed a sustained immune response, including immune-regulatory features, while anti-PD1-resistant lesions had a distinct immune cell niche but were generally immune-poor with non-expanded T cell receptor (TCR) clones. The study also revealed that anti-PD1-resistant tumors had reduced fractions of PD1+ CD8+ T cells compared to ICB-naïve metastases. Additionally, the authors performed transcriptomic and spatial analyses to explore the differences in immune transcriptional programs and tumor cell states between anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 resistant melanomas. They found that anti-CTLA4-resistant tumors had a higher number of expanded TCR clones and an increased abundance of FOXP3+ T regulatory cells, while anti-PD1-resistant tumors had a higher frequency of bystander CD8+ T cells that did not express PD1. These findings highlight the complexity of ICB resistance and the distinct mechanisms underlying resistance to anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 therapies.