Never-Ending Learning

Never-Ending Learning

MAY 2018 | VOL. 61 | NO. 5 | T. Mitchell, W. Cohen, E. Hruschka, P. Talukdar, B. Yang, J. Betteridge, A. Carlson, B. Dalvi, M. Gardner, B. Kisiel, J. Krishnamurthy, N. Lao, K. Mazaitis, T. Mohamed, N. Nakashole, E. Platanios, A. Ritter, M. Samadi, B. Settles, R. Wang, D. Wijaya, A. Gupta, X. Chen, A. Saparov, M. Greaves, and J. Welling
The paper "Never-Ending Learning" by T. Mitchell et al. explores the concept of developing machine learning systems that can learn continuously and comprehensively, similar to human learning. The authors argue that current machine learning systems are narrow and limited in their ability to learn from diverse experiences over time, unlike humans who learn many different types of knowledge and improve over years of experience. They propose a paradigm called "never-ending learning," which involves systems that can learn multiple types of knowledge, from diverse and self-supervised experiences, and continuously improve their performance. The paper introduces the Never-Ending Language Learner (NELL), a system designed to read the web 24/7 and learn from it. NELL has been running since January 2010 and has acquired a knowledge base of 120 million diverse, confidence-weighted beliefs. NELL also learns to reason over its knowledge base to infer new beliefs and invent new relational predicates to extend its ontology. The authors define the never-ending learning problem formally and describe NELL's architecture, which includes a knowledge base that serves as a shared blackboard for various learning and inference modules. NELL's learning tasks include category classification, relation classification, entity resolution, and inference rules among belief triples. The system uses coupling constraints to link these tasks, ensuring consistency and mutual support. Empirical evaluations show that NELL's reading accuracy and the size of its knowledge base have improved over time. However, the system still faces challenges, such as the difficulty of learning certain categories and the need for more diverse data sources. The authors discuss future directions, including adding self-reflection capabilities, broadening data sources, expanding the ontology, and developing more advanced reading methods. Overall, the paper provides a detailed case study of a never-ending learning system and highlights the potential benefits and challenges of this approach.The paper "Never-Ending Learning" by T. Mitchell et al. explores the concept of developing machine learning systems that can learn continuously and comprehensively, similar to human learning. The authors argue that current machine learning systems are narrow and limited in their ability to learn from diverse experiences over time, unlike humans who learn many different types of knowledge and improve over years of experience. They propose a paradigm called "never-ending learning," which involves systems that can learn multiple types of knowledge, from diverse and self-supervised experiences, and continuously improve their performance. The paper introduces the Never-Ending Language Learner (NELL), a system designed to read the web 24/7 and learn from it. NELL has been running since January 2010 and has acquired a knowledge base of 120 million diverse, confidence-weighted beliefs. NELL also learns to reason over its knowledge base to infer new beliefs and invent new relational predicates to extend its ontology. The authors define the never-ending learning problem formally and describe NELL's architecture, which includes a knowledge base that serves as a shared blackboard for various learning and inference modules. NELL's learning tasks include category classification, relation classification, entity resolution, and inference rules among belief triples. The system uses coupling constraints to link these tasks, ensuring consistency and mutual support. Empirical evaluations show that NELL's reading accuracy and the size of its knowledge base have improved over time. However, the system still faces challenges, such as the difficulty of learning certain categories and the need for more diverse data sources. The authors discuss future directions, including adding self-reflection capabilities, broadening data sources, expanding the ontology, and developing more advanced reading methods. Overall, the paper provides a detailed case study of a never-ending learning system and highlights the potential benefits and challenges of this approach.
Reach us at info@study.space
Understanding Never-Ending Learning