2018 April 05 | R.J. Motzer, N.M. Tannir, D.F. McDermott, O. Arén Frontera, B. Melichar, T.K. Choueiri, E.R. Plimack, P. Barthélémy, C. Porta, S. George, T. Powles, F. Donskov, V. Neiman, C.K. Kollmannsberger, P. Salman, H. Gurney, R. Hawkins, A. Ravaud, M.-O. Grimm, S. Bracarda, C.H. Barrios, Y. Tomita, D. Castellano, B.I. Rini, A.C. Chen, S. Mekan, M.B. McHenry, M. Wind-Rotolo, J. Doan, P. Sharma, H.J. Hammers, B. Escudier, and for the CheckMate 214 Investigators
A phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib in previously untreated advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. The study enrolled 1096 patients, with 550 assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 546 to sunitinib. The primary endpoints were overall survival, objective response rate, and progression-free survival. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed significantly higher overall survival (75% at 18 months vs. 60% with sunitinib) and objective response rate (42% vs. 27%) compared to sunitinib. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 8.4 months with sunitinib. Treatment-related adverse events were common, with 93% of patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 97% in the sunitinib group experiencing at least one adverse event. Grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 46% and 63% of patients, respectively. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with a lower risk of death compared to sunitinib, with a hazard ratio of 0.63. The combination therapy showed significant benefits in overall survival and objective response rate in intermediate- and poor-risk patients. The trial was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical. The results suggest that nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a more effective treatment option for previously untreated advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib.A phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib in previously untreated advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. The study enrolled 1096 patients, with 550 assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 546 to sunitinib. The primary endpoints were overall survival, objective response rate, and progression-free survival. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed significantly higher overall survival (75% at 18 months vs. 60% with sunitinib) and objective response rate (42% vs. 27%) compared to sunitinib. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 8.4 months with sunitinib. Treatment-related adverse events were common, with 93% of patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 97% in the sunitinib group experiencing at least one adverse event. Grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 46% and 63% of patients, respectively. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with a lower risk of death compared to sunitinib, with a hazard ratio of 0.63. The combination therapy showed significant benefits in overall survival and objective response rate in intermediate- and poor-risk patients. The trial was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical. The results suggest that nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a more effective treatment option for previously untreated advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib.