The paper "Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response" by R.M. Wise et al. explores the need to adapt to climate change and the challenges faced in implementing effective adaptation actions. Despite significant investments in adaptation science, the literature and case studies show that most adaptation actions have been incremental and focused on proximate causes, with limited reports of systemic or transformative changes. The authors argue that the framing of adaptation is crucial and influence the nature and effectiveness of responses. They propose a broader conceptualization of "adaptation pathways" that draws on 'pathways thinking' in sustainable development, emphasizing the need to address systemic drivers of vulnerability and societal transitions. This approach aims to inform decision-makers about integrating incremental actions with transformative societal changes. The paper discusses the limitations of current adaptation research and practice, the importance of understanding the interplay between knowledge, values, power, and agency, and the need for a paradigm shift in the framing of adaptation. It concludes with a call for further exploration of this broader conceptualization to enhance ongoing and dynamic adaptation actions.The paper "Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response" by R.M. Wise et al. explores the need to adapt to climate change and the challenges faced in implementing effective adaptation actions. Despite significant investments in adaptation science, the literature and case studies show that most adaptation actions have been incremental and focused on proximate causes, with limited reports of systemic or transformative changes. The authors argue that the framing of adaptation is crucial and influence the nature and effectiveness of responses. They propose a broader conceptualization of "adaptation pathways" that draws on 'pathways thinking' in sustainable development, emphasizing the need to address systemic drivers of vulnerability and societal transitions. This approach aims to inform decision-makers about integrating incremental actions with transformative societal changes. The paper discusses the limitations of current adaptation research and practice, the importance of understanding the interplay between knowledge, values, power, and agency, and the need for a paradigm shift in the framing of adaptation. It concludes with a call for further exploration of this broader conceptualization to enhance ongoing and dynamic adaptation actions.