The article "Reimagining the Language of Engagement in a Post-Stakeholder World" critically examines the limitations and implications of the term "stakeholder." The authors argue that while the term is widely used, it may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. They emphasize the importance of using language that gives voice to marginalized groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful participation in decision-making processes. The paper aims to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Instead of advocating for a single alternative term, the authors suggest focusing on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues. The article also discusses the broader issues surrounding the use of problematic terminology in research engagement, highlighting the need for person-centered language to reduce social harm and stigma.The article "Reimagining the Language of Engagement in a Post-Stakeholder World" critically examines the limitations and implications of the term "stakeholder." The authors argue that while the term is widely used, it may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. They emphasize the importance of using language that gives voice to marginalized groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful participation in decision-making processes. The paper aims to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Instead of advocating for a single alternative term, the authors suggest focusing on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues. The article also discusses the broader issues surrounding the use of problematic terminology in research engagement, highlighting the need for person-centered language to reduce social harm and stigma.