The term "stakeholder" is widely used in research and higher education, but its use may perpetuate colonial narratives and systemic inequities. This article critically examines the limitations of the stakeholder concept, emphasizing the need for language that promotes inclusion, equity, and meaningful participation. The authors argue that the term "stakeholder" is exclusionary and may reinforce power imbalances, particularly in relation to Indigenous communities and non-human species. Instead of proposing a single alternative term, they suggest focusing on the people, places, and species affected by decisions and actions. Language is central to how we relate, communicate, and understand the world. It can promote inclusion or exclusion, and its use can influence perceptions and behaviors. The authors call for a shift away from the term "stakeholder" and toward more inclusive and ethical language that reflects the diverse perspectives and experiences of all individuals and groups. They highlight the importance of decolonizing research norms and creating more equitable societies. The paper originated from a workshop and online discussions, aiming to foster inclusive contributions and open a broader debate. The authors emphasize the need for critical examination of the stakeholder paradigm, raising awareness of its inherent issues, and discussing the appropriateness of alternatives. They advocate for a more equitable and ethical approach to research engagement, one that prioritizes the voices and experiences of marginalized groups. The authors also note the ongoing debates around engagement, including issues of equity, trust, power, and whose realities are considered in participatory processes. They encourage a more symmetrical approach to research conducted in partnership with minoritized groups.The term "stakeholder" is widely used in research and higher education, but its use may perpetuate colonial narratives and systemic inequities. This article critically examines the limitations of the stakeholder concept, emphasizing the need for language that promotes inclusion, equity, and meaningful participation. The authors argue that the term "stakeholder" is exclusionary and may reinforce power imbalances, particularly in relation to Indigenous communities and non-human species. Instead of proposing a single alternative term, they suggest focusing on the people, places, and species affected by decisions and actions. Language is central to how we relate, communicate, and understand the world. It can promote inclusion or exclusion, and its use can influence perceptions and behaviors. The authors call for a shift away from the term "stakeholder" and toward more inclusive and ethical language that reflects the diverse perspectives and experiences of all individuals and groups. They highlight the importance of decolonizing research norms and creating more equitable societies. The paper originated from a workshop and online discussions, aiming to foster inclusive contributions and open a broader debate. The authors emphasize the need for critical examination of the stakeholder paradigm, raising awareness of its inherent issues, and discussing the appropriateness of alternatives. They advocate for a more equitable and ethical approach to research engagement, one that prioritizes the voices and experiences of marginalized groups. The authors also note the ongoing debates around engagement, including issues of equity, trust, power, and whose realities are considered in participatory processes. They encourage a more symmetrical approach to research conducted in partnership with minoritized groups.