The chapter discusses the concept of "signature pedagogies" in various professions, emphasizing their role in shaping the fundamental ways future practitioners are educated. Signature pedagogies are distinctive teaching methods that organize the critical aspects of professional work—thinking, performing, and acting with integrity. These methods vary across professions, such as law, medicine, and engineering, each with its own unique approach. For example, law schools focus on case dialogue, medical schools on bedside teaching, and engineering schools on mathematical and practical problem-solving. The chapter highlights the importance of signature pedagogies in defining the knowledge, skills, and values expected of professionals. These pedagogies are pervasive and routine, simplifying complex professional challenges by establishing well-defined frameworks. However, they can also lead to rigidity if not regularly reevaluated and adapted to changing conditions. The text also discusses the emotional and interactive aspects of signature pedagogies, which create a dynamic and engaging learning environment that fosters both excitement and anxiety. Finally, the chapter suggests that comparing and learning from different signature pedagogies can improve professional education across various fields. It concludes by noting that signature pedagogies are not static and can be influenced by changes in practice, new technologies, and critiques of professional quality. The way we teach will significantly shape how professionals behave, making it crucial to continuously refine and adapt these methods.The chapter discusses the concept of "signature pedagogies" in various professions, emphasizing their role in shaping the fundamental ways future practitioners are educated. Signature pedagogies are distinctive teaching methods that organize the critical aspects of professional work—thinking, performing, and acting with integrity. These methods vary across professions, such as law, medicine, and engineering, each with its own unique approach. For example, law schools focus on case dialogue, medical schools on bedside teaching, and engineering schools on mathematical and practical problem-solving. The chapter highlights the importance of signature pedagogies in defining the knowledge, skills, and values expected of professionals. These pedagogies are pervasive and routine, simplifying complex professional challenges by establishing well-defined frameworks. However, they can also lead to rigidity if not regularly reevaluated and adapted to changing conditions. The text also discusses the emotional and interactive aspects of signature pedagogies, which create a dynamic and engaging learning environment that fosters both excitement and anxiety. Finally, the chapter suggests that comparing and learning from different signature pedagogies can improve professional education across various fields. It concludes by noting that signature pedagogies are not static and can be influenced by changes in practice, new technologies, and critiques of professional quality. The way we teach will significantly shape how professionals behave, making it crucial to continuously refine and adapt these methods.