This section outlines best practices and recommendations for states and stakeholders (NHRIs and CSOs) during the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, based on contributions and the Secretariat's Human Rights Unit work over the first year of the UPR. For states, a genuine assessment of the human rights situation is essential, with open discussions with peers and willingness to take steps to improve the situation. A positive political approach can facilitate follow-up discussions and encourage assistance. Commonwealth governments could collaborate to streamline internal processes and develop best practices. Preparation for the UPR in Geneva requires consultation with stakeholders, including NHRI and CSOs, to ensure understanding of the process. Information should be disseminated to these groups, and a transparent timeline for consultations should be followed. Reports should focus on achievements and challenges rather than narratives. States without a Geneva office should collaborate with other missions for information. An updated directory of officials involved in UPR processes is recommended. Developing states may seek financial assistance from the voluntary trust fund. After Geneva, information about the UPR experience and accepted recommendations should be widely disseminated. Continued consultation with stakeholders is important when implementing recommendations. Developing states can seek financial and technical assistance from the voluntary fund or third parties. The HRU can offer expertise. For stakeholders, participation in pre-UPR consultations is important to ensure relevant input. Stakeholder reports should focus on constructive solutions. Observing the UPR working session is recommended. CSOs may choose to submit individual or consolidated reports. Advocacy through suggesting questions and recommendations to other states is encouraged. After Geneva, public awareness should be increased, and the government's adherence to recommendations should be encouraged. Post-UPR consultations can help establish timelines and action plans. Work plans should align with UPR outcomes.This section outlines best practices and recommendations for states and stakeholders (NHRIs and CSOs) during the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, based on contributions and the Secretariat's Human Rights Unit work over the first year of the UPR. For states, a genuine assessment of the human rights situation is essential, with open discussions with peers and willingness to take steps to improve the situation. A positive political approach can facilitate follow-up discussions and encourage assistance. Commonwealth governments could collaborate to streamline internal processes and develop best practices. Preparation for the UPR in Geneva requires consultation with stakeholders, including NHRI and CSOs, to ensure understanding of the process. Information should be disseminated to these groups, and a transparent timeline for consultations should be followed. Reports should focus on achievements and challenges rather than narratives. States without a Geneva office should collaborate with other missions for information. An updated directory of officials involved in UPR processes is recommended. Developing states may seek financial assistance from the voluntary trust fund. After Geneva, information about the UPR experience and accepted recommendations should be widely disseminated. Continued consultation with stakeholders is important when implementing recommendations. Developing states can seek financial and technical assistance from the voluntary fund or third parties. The HRU can offer expertise. For stakeholders, participation in pre-UPR consultations is important to ensure relevant input. Stakeholder reports should focus on constructive solutions. Observing the UPR working session is recommended. CSOs may choose to submit individual or consolidated reports. Advocacy through suggesting questions and recommendations to other states is encouraged. After Geneva, public awareness should be increased, and the government's adherence to recommendations should be encouraged. Post-UPR consultations can help establish timelines and action plans. Work plans should align with UPR outcomes.