The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research

The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research

June 9, 2015 | Leonard P. Freedman, Iain M. Cockburn, Timothy S. Simcoe
The article "The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research" by Leonard P. Freedman, Iain M. Cockburn, and Timothy S. Simcoe addresses the significant issue of low reproducibility rates in life science research, which undermines cumulative knowledge production and delays therapeutic drug development. The authors estimate that the cumulative prevalence of irreproducible preclinical research exceeds 50%, resulting in approximately US$28 billion spent annually on unreproducible research in the United States alone. They outline a framework for solutions and a plan for long-term improvements in reproducibility rates, emphasizing the need for community-developed best practices and standards. The article also discusses the economic impact of irreproducibility, highlighting the potential savings and increased efficiency in drug development if reproducibility is improved. The authors propose specific steps to enhance reproducibility, such as improving training programs, promoting the use of validated reagents, and establishing research funder policies that require the use of best practices. They conclude that while there are no easy solutions, the societal benefits of increased reproducibility far outweigh the costs, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders are crucial to achieving these improvements.The article "The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research" by Leonard P. Freedman, Iain M. Cockburn, and Timothy S. Simcoe addresses the significant issue of low reproducibility rates in life science research, which undermines cumulative knowledge production and delays therapeutic drug development. The authors estimate that the cumulative prevalence of irreproducible preclinical research exceeds 50%, resulting in approximately US$28 billion spent annually on unreproducible research in the United States alone. They outline a framework for solutions and a plan for long-term improvements in reproducibility rates, emphasizing the need for community-developed best practices and standards. The article also discusses the economic impact of irreproducibility, highlighting the potential savings and increased efficiency in drug development if reproducibility is improved. The authors propose specific steps to enhance reproducibility, such as improving training programs, promoting the use of validated reagents, and establishing research funder policies that require the use of best practices. They conclude that while there are no easy solutions, the societal benefits of increased reproducibility far outweigh the costs, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders are crucial to achieving these improvements.
Reach us at info@study.space