The General Medical Council (GMC) has published a vision for the future of medical education and training, which has been endorsed by the Royal Colleges of Physicians. The vision includes three key areas: building a larger workforce with multidisciplinary educators, changing prequalification education, and supporting career development and lifelong learning. The GMC argues that the current system is not fit for purpose and that medical education needs transformation. The proposed changes include reducing the length of medical school curricula and shifting postgraduate training from formal pathways to outcomes-based approaches. However, critics argue that these changes may not adequately prepare doctors for the complex needs of an aging population. The GMC's approach lacks evidence-based analysis and has been criticized for its urgency and lack of consultation. The proposed changes could lead to less rigorous training and potentially compromise patient safety. The GMC has also been criticized for not listening to concerns about the scope of practice of physician associates and for not addressing patient safety concerns. The vision risks undermining the credibility of the medical profession and its institutions. Critics argue that the GMC is prioritizing speed and cost over quality, which could have long-term consequences for patient care and the reputation of British doctors internationally. The GMC's vision for medical education and training is seen as a significant departure from traditional approaches and may have serious implications for the future of medicine.The General Medical Council (GMC) has published a vision for the future of medical education and training, which has been endorsed by the Royal Colleges of Physicians. The vision includes three key areas: building a larger workforce with multidisciplinary educators, changing prequalification education, and supporting career development and lifelong learning. The GMC argues that the current system is not fit for purpose and that medical education needs transformation. The proposed changes include reducing the length of medical school curricula and shifting postgraduate training from formal pathways to outcomes-based approaches. However, critics argue that these changes may not adequately prepare doctors for the complex needs of an aging population. The GMC's approach lacks evidence-based analysis and has been criticized for its urgency and lack of consultation. The proposed changes could lead to less rigorous training and potentially compromise patient safety. The GMC has also been criticized for not listening to concerns about the scope of practice of physician associates and for not addressing patient safety concerns. The vision risks undermining the credibility of the medical profession and its institutions. Critics argue that the GMC is prioritizing speed and cost over quality, which could have long-term consequences for patient care and the reputation of British doctors internationally. The GMC's vision for medical education and training is seen as a significant departure from traditional approaches and may have serious implications for the future of medicine.