The Great Psychotherapy Debate Professor G.P.J. Keijsers discusses the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of psychotherapy, emphasizing the need for a balanced understanding of both specific treatment techniques and common factors that contribute to therapeutic success. The debate highlights the importance of empirical evidence in evaluating psychotherapeutic interventions, particularly in the context of healthcare financing and the increasing use of e-health. Keijsers argues that while empirically supported treatments (ESTs) are effective for specific psychological disorders, the role of the therapeutic relationship and common factors cannot be overlooked. He critiques the "dodo-bird verdict," which suggests that all psychotherapies are equally effective, and emphasizes the significance of the therapeutic alliance in treatment outcomes. Keijsers also discusses the challenges of identifying the specific components of effective psychotherapy and the need for further research into common factors. He advocates for a more integrated approach between clinical practice and academic research, emphasizing the importance of understanding the psychological processes underlying therapeutic change. The debate underscores the complexity of psychotherapy and the need for a comprehensive understanding of both the techniques used and the broader therapeutic context.The Great Psychotherapy Debate Professor G.P.J. Keijsers discusses the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of psychotherapy, emphasizing the need for a balanced understanding of both specific treatment techniques and common factors that contribute to therapeutic success. The debate highlights the importance of empirical evidence in evaluating psychotherapeutic interventions, particularly in the context of healthcare financing and the increasing use of e-health. Keijsers argues that while empirically supported treatments (ESTs) are effective for specific psychological disorders, the role of the therapeutic relationship and common factors cannot be overlooked. He critiques the "dodo-bird verdict," which suggests that all psychotherapies are equally effective, and emphasizes the significance of the therapeutic alliance in treatment outcomes. Keijsers also discusses the challenges of identifying the specific components of effective psychotherapy and the need for further research into common factors. He advocates for a more integrated approach between clinical practice and academic research, emphasizing the importance of understanding the psychological processes underlying therapeutic change. The debate underscores the complexity of psychotherapy and the need for a comprehensive understanding of both the techniques used and the broader therapeutic context.