The Illusion of Empathy? Notes on Displays of Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction

The Illusion of Empathy? Notes on Displays of Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction

2024 | Andrea Cuadra, Maria Wang, Lynn Andrea Stein, Malte F. Jung, Nicola Dell, Deborah Estrin, James A. Landay
The paper "The Illusion of Empathy? Notes on Displays of Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction" by Andrea Cuadra et al. explores the concept of empathy in interactions between humans and Conversational Agents (CAs), particularly those powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). The authors highlight the potential benefits and risks of using empathy in CA design, emphasizing the need to distinguish between empathy evoked between two humans and that between a human and a CA. They systematically prompt CAs to display empathy while conversing with or about 65 distinct human identities and compare how different LLMs handle empathy. Key findings include: 1. **Diverse Responses to Identity Disclosures**: CAs can make value judgments about certain identities and may encourage harmful ideologies, such as Nazism and xenophobia. 2. **Inconsistent and Flippant Displays**: Despite their ability to display empathy, CAs often show inconsistent responses, flippant attitudes towards harmful ideologies, and hollow displays of empathy. 3. **Computational Evaluation**: A computational approach to understanding empathy reveals that while CAs can generate empathetic responses, they often fail to interpret and explore users' experiences as effectively as human counterparts. The paper contributes to the literature by developing a new method for observing empathy evocations in interactions with CAs and highlighting the need for more harm mitigation strategies. It also shows that despite LLMs' advanced capabilities, their displays of empathy are inconsistent and can be misleading or exploitative. The authors advocate for a critical perspective on the use of empathy in CA design to ensure more just and responsible systems.The paper "The Illusion of Empathy? Notes on Displays of Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction" by Andrea Cuadra et al. explores the concept of empathy in interactions between humans and Conversational Agents (CAs), particularly those powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). The authors highlight the potential benefits and risks of using empathy in CA design, emphasizing the need to distinguish between empathy evoked between two humans and that between a human and a CA. They systematically prompt CAs to display empathy while conversing with or about 65 distinct human identities and compare how different LLMs handle empathy. Key findings include: 1. **Diverse Responses to Identity Disclosures**: CAs can make value judgments about certain identities and may encourage harmful ideologies, such as Nazism and xenophobia. 2. **Inconsistent and Flippant Displays**: Despite their ability to display empathy, CAs often show inconsistent responses, flippant attitudes towards harmful ideologies, and hollow displays of empathy. 3. **Computational Evaluation**: A computational approach to understanding empathy reveals that while CAs can generate empathetic responses, they often fail to interpret and explore users' experiences as effectively as human counterparts. The paper contributes to the literature by developing a new method for observing empathy evocations in interactions with CAs and highlighting the need for more harm mitigation strategies. It also shows that despite LLMs' advanced capabilities, their displays of empathy are inconsistent and can be misleading or exploitative. The authors advocate for a critical perspective on the use of empathy in CA design to ensure more just and responsible systems.
Reach us at info@study.space