This article discusses the importance of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in entrepreneurship research and provides a structured approach for conducting them. SLRs are a method for synthesizing existing literature in a field, ensuring transparency, objectivity, and reproducibility. The article highlights the differences between traditional literature reviews and SLRs, emphasizing that SLRs follow a systematic methodology, are transparent, and aim to answer specific research questions. It also discusses the limitations of traditional reviews, such as subjectivity and lack of reproducibility, and how SLRs can overcome these issues. The article outlines the process of conducting an SLR, including identifying the need for the review, developing a review protocol, identifying and evaluating studies, extracting and synthesizing data, and disseminating the findings. It emphasizes the importance of using academic databases and peer-reviewed journals to ensure the quality of the review. The article also provides a list of highly ranked entrepreneurship journals for quality appraisal and discusses the role of SLRs in advancing research in the field. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of SLRs in entrepreneurship research, as they help to synthesize existing literature, identify research gaps, and develop new theories. It also highlights the need for authors to follow best practices when conducting SLRs, such as using transparent methodologies, ensuring the quality of the literature reviewed, and providing a clear synthesis of the findings. The article provides concrete tips for conducting an SLR, including the use of academic databases, defining keywords, and ensuring the quality of the literature reviewed. Overall, the article supports the use of SLRs in entrepreneurship research as a valuable tool for advancing the field.This article discusses the importance of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in entrepreneurship research and provides a structured approach for conducting them. SLRs are a method for synthesizing existing literature in a field, ensuring transparency, objectivity, and reproducibility. The article highlights the differences between traditional literature reviews and SLRs, emphasizing that SLRs follow a systematic methodology, are transparent, and aim to answer specific research questions. It also discusses the limitations of traditional reviews, such as subjectivity and lack of reproducibility, and how SLRs can overcome these issues. The article outlines the process of conducting an SLR, including identifying the need for the review, developing a review protocol, identifying and evaluating studies, extracting and synthesizing data, and disseminating the findings. It emphasizes the importance of using academic databases and peer-reviewed journals to ensure the quality of the review. The article also provides a list of highly ranked entrepreneurship journals for quality appraisal and discusses the role of SLRs in advancing research in the field. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of SLRs in entrepreneurship research, as they help to synthesize existing literature, identify research gaps, and develop new theories. It also highlights the need for authors to follow best practices when conducting SLRs, such as using transparent methodologies, ensuring the quality of the literature reviewed, and providing a clear synthesis of the findings. The article provides concrete tips for conducting an SLR, including the use of academic databases, defining keywords, and ensuring the quality of the literature reviewed. Overall, the article supports the use of SLRs in entrepreneurship research as a valuable tool for advancing the field.