The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies

The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies

2000 | SUNIYA S. LUTHAR and DANTE CICCHETTI
The article by Suniya S. Luthar and Dante Cicchetti explores the interface between research on resilience and its application in developing interventions and social policies. Resilience is defined as a dynamic process where individuals show positive adaptation despite significant adversity or trauma. The authors highlight the importance of identifying vulnerability and protective factors that modify the effects of risk and the mechanisms underlying these factors. They emphasize the need for a shift from focusing on maladjustment to considering competence and strengths in at-risk populations. The article discusses the advantages, limitations, and precautions associated with applying the resilience framework, including the risk of misinterpretation as a personal trait and the need for careful presentation of findings. It also addresses fiscal concerns, arguing that preventive interventions can be cost-effective by harnessing existing resources and preventing serious long-term problems. The authors provide guiding principles for developing interventions and policies based on the resilience paradigm, such as strong theoretical foundations and careful documentation and evaluation. Finally, they present examples of interventions for families affected by parental mental illness, demonstrating the practical application of resilience research.The article by Suniya S. Luthar and Dante Cicchetti explores the interface between research on resilience and its application in developing interventions and social policies. Resilience is defined as a dynamic process where individuals show positive adaptation despite significant adversity or trauma. The authors highlight the importance of identifying vulnerability and protective factors that modify the effects of risk and the mechanisms underlying these factors. They emphasize the need for a shift from focusing on maladjustment to considering competence and strengths in at-risk populations. The article discusses the advantages, limitations, and precautions associated with applying the resilience framework, including the risk of misinterpretation as a personal trait and the need for careful presentation of findings. It also addresses fiscal concerns, arguing that preventive interventions can be cost-effective by harnessing existing resources and preventing serious long-term problems. The authors provide guiding principles for developing interventions and policies based on the resilience paradigm, such as strong theoretical foundations and careful documentation and evaluation. Finally, they present examples of interventions for families affected by parental mental illness, demonstrating the practical application of resilience research.
Reach us at info@study.space