The Structure of the 'THE' -Multiprogramming System

The Structure of the 'THE' -Multiprogramming System

Volume 11 / Number 5 / May, 1968 | Edsger W. Dijkstra
The paper by Edsger W. Dijkstra describes the design and implementation of a multiprogramming system at the Technological University in Eindhoven, Netherlands. The system is designed to process a continuous flow of user programs efficiently, with objectives including reducing turnaround time for short-duration programs, optimizing peripheral device usage, and achieving economic feasibility for applications that require only general-purpose computer capabilities. The system is structured as a hierarchy of sequential processes, each at a different level, to ensure logical soundness and correctness. Key features of the system include: 1. **Storage Allocation**: Information is identified by segments, which are independent of memory pages, allowing for flexible allocation and efficient use of storage. 2. **Processor Allocation**: The system is designed to handle multiple sequential processes with undefined speed ratios, using explicit mutual synchronization to ensure cooperation. 3. **System Hierarchy**: The system has five logical levels, each responsible for specific tasks such as processor allocation, segment management, and user interaction, ensuring that the system can adapt to different configurations. The design process involved significant effort in system conception, construction, and verification. The authors learned to reason about the system's behavior and prove its correctness through a hierarchical approach. The verification stage involved extensive testing, starting from the lowest level and gradually adding higher levels, ensuring that all relevant states were covered. The paper also discusses the use of semaphores for mutual exclusion and private semaphores for process coordination, and provides a detailed proof of the system's harmonious cooperation, demonstrating that the system can handle tasks without infinite loops or circular waits. Overall, the system is presented as a successful example of structured design, emphasizing the importance of hierarchical organization and explicit synchronization in achieving robust and verifiable multiprogramming systems.The paper by Edsger W. Dijkstra describes the design and implementation of a multiprogramming system at the Technological University in Eindhoven, Netherlands. The system is designed to process a continuous flow of user programs efficiently, with objectives including reducing turnaround time for short-duration programs, optimizing peripheral device usage, and achieving economic feasibility for applications that require only general-purpose computer capabilities. The system is structured as a hierarchy of sequential processes, each at a different level, to ensure logical soundness and correctness. Key features of the system include: 1. **Storage Allocation**: Information is identified by segments, which are independent of memory pages, allowing for flexible allocation and efficient use of storage. 2. **Processor Allocation**: The system is designed to handle multiple sequential processes with undefined speed ratios, using explicit mutual synchronization to ensure cooperation. 3. **System Hierarchy**: The system has five logical levels, each responsible for specific tasks such as processor allocation, segment management, and user interaction, ensuring that the system can adapt to different configurations. The design process involved significant effort in system conception, construction, and verification. The authors learned to reason about the system's behavior and prove its correctness through a hierarchical approach. The verification stage involved extensive testing, starting from the lowest level and gradually adding higher levels, ensuring that all relevant states were covered. The paper also discusses the use of semaphores for mutual exclusion and private semaphores for process coordination, and provides a detailed proof of the system's harmonious cooperation, demonstrating that the system can handle tasks without infinite loops or circular waits. Overall, the system is presented as a successful example of structured design, emphasizing the importance of hierarchical organization and explicit synchronization in achieving robust and verifiable multiprogramming systems.
Reach us at info@study.space