The article explores the potential and limitations of ChatGPT in psychotherapy, a chatbot developed by OpenAI. The author, a psychotherapist, conducted three detailed case studies to analyze ChatGPT's responses to psychotherapists seeking assistance, patients between sessions, and individuals with mental illnesses who are not yet in therapy. The results suggest that ChatGPT can serve as an interesting complement to psychotherapy, providing easily accessible and good (free) support for people with mental health issues who have not sought professional help. However, the information provided is one-sided and biased towards cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which may not be suitable for all patients. The article emphasizes the need for regulation to address ethical concerns and ensure that ChatGPT's recommendations are not insufficient or biased. Despite these limitations, ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for psychotherapists and patients, but it should not replace professional psychotherapy. The author concludes that while ChatGPT has its strengths, such as providing detailed information and empathy, it lacks the ability to handle complex therapeutic situations and recognize nonverbal cues, which are crucial in person-centered psychotherapy. Overall, the article highlights the potential benefits and the need for careful consideration and regulation of ChatGPT's use in psychotherapy.The article explores the potential and limitations of ChatGPT in psychotherapy, a chatbot developed by OpenAI. The author, a psychotherapist, conducted three detailed case studies to analyze ChatGPT's responses to psychotherapists seeking assistance, patients between sessions, and individuals with mental illnesses who are not yet in therapy. The results suggest that ChatGPT can serve as an interesting complement to psychotherapy, providing easily accessible and good (free) support for people with mental health issues who have not sought professional help. However, the information provided is one-sided and biased towards cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which may not be suitable for all patients. The article emphasizes the need for regulation to address ethical concerns and ensure that ChatGPT's recommendations are not insufficient or biased. Despite these limitations, ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for psychotherapists and patients, but it should not replace professional psychotherapy. The author concludes that while ChatGPT has its strengths, such as providing detailed information and empathy, it lacks the ability to handle complex therapeutic situations and recognize nonverbal cues, which are crucial in person-centered psychotherapy. Overall, the article highlights the potential benefits and the need for careful consideration and regulation of ChatGPT's use in psychotherapy.