This article provides guidelines for writing meta-analytic reviews, which are quantitative summaries of research literature. It outlines the essential components of a meta-analytic report, including the introduction, method, results, and discussion sections. The method section should detail literature searches, inclusion criteria, and study characteristics. The results section should describe effect sizes, variability, significance tests, and heterogeneity. The discussion section should interpret the findings and place them in the context of the field. The article emphasizes the importance of keeping reports simple, basic, and intuitive, while also providing detailed procedures for various statistical analyses. It also highlights the need to address issues such as publication bias and the file drawer problem. The goal is to ensure that meta-analytic reviews are comprehensive, transparent, and useful for both researchers and practitioners.This article provides guidelines for writing meta-analytic reviews, which are quantitative summaries of research literature. It outlines the essential components of a meta-analytic report, including the introduction, method, results, and discussion sections. The method section should detail literature searches, inclusion criteria, and study characteristics. The results section should describe effect sizes, variability, significance tests, and heterogeneity. The discussion section should interpret the findings and place them in the context of the field. The article emphasizes the importance of keeping reports simple, basic, and intuitive, while also providing detailed procedures for various statistical analyses. It also highlights the need to address issues such as publication bias and the file drawer problem. The goal is to ensure that meta-analytic reviews are comprehensive, transparent, and useful for both researchers and practitioners.